Law Firm in Mumbai Singhania Law firm India mumbai Corporate Lawyer, Solicitors & Advocates India Law Firm in Mumbai Singhania Law firm India mumbai Corporate Lawyer, Solicitors & Advocates India
 
Areas of Practise
Latest News
Challenge to imposition of penalty for delaying tax dismissed
Read More..
Concealing facts before arbitrator is fraud
Read More..
No export duty on transfer of goods to SEZs, rules SC
Read More..
Dismissal only punishment in corruption case: SC
Read More..
Technicalities should not choke justice on merits
Read More..
Irda, which is drafting the initial public offering (IPO) guidelines for insurers, will release the norms only after the FDI cap is raised.
Read More..
Zero commission’ by airlines illegal, says DGCA
Read More..
Unborn firm cannot sign arbitration agreement
Read More..
One year for FDI warrant conversion
Read More..
The Finance bill pased with some tax relief
Read More..
To stop patent fights, India gives US, UK access to database
Read More..
Official cannot withdraw offer of voluntary retirement
Read More..
RBI releases draft rules on investment firms
Read More..
Withholding tax debate ends?
Read More..
Insurance firm told to pay up
Read More..
Newsletter Signup
  Latest News  
  Karnataka high court to review Income Tax decision-Supreme Court  
 

15th Feb 2010

The Supreme Court earlier this month called upon the Karnataka high court to reconsider question relating to income tax on credit societies in the case of Totgars' Cooperative Sale Society Ltd v Income Tax Officer. The cooperative credit society in this instance had surplus funds which they invested in short-term deposits with banks and in government securities and these societies provided credit facilities to its members and also marketed agricultural produce of its members. The question which arose was whether such interest income would qualify for deduction as business income under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act. According to the high court such interest would fall under the head 'income from other sources' and therefore the assessee was not entitled to the benefit of deduction. Since this question was not discussed at all, the Supreme Court asked the Karnataka High Court to interpret Sections 56 and 57 of the Act and pass a fresh judgment.

 
Home | The Firm | Articles | Events | Careers | Contact Us                              Website Designed by Dreamz Net Solutions Website Designing Company India