Law Firm in Mumbai Singhania Law firm India mumbai Corporate Lawyer, Solicitors & Advocates India Law Firm in Mumbai Singhania Law firm India mumbai Corporate Lawyer, Solicitors & Advocates India
 
Areas of Practise
Latest News
Challenge to imposition of penalty for delaying tax dismissed
Read More..
Concealing facts before arbitrator is fraud
Read More..
No export duty on transfer of goods to SEZs, rules SC
Read More..
Dismissal only punishment in corruption case: SC
Read More..
Technicalities should not choke justice on merits
Read More..
Irda, which is drafting the initial public offering (IPO) guidelines for insurers, will release the norms only after the FDI cap is raised.
Read More..
Zero commission’ by airlines illegal, says DGCA
Read More..
Unborn firm cannot sign arbitration agreement
Read More..
One year for FDI warrant conversion
Read More..
The Finance bill pased with some tax relief
Read More..
To stop patent fights, India gives US, UK access to database
Read More..
Official cannot withdraw offer of voluntary retirement
Read More..
RBI releases draft rules on investment firms
Read More..
Withholding tax debate ends?
Read More..
Insurance firm told to pay up
Read More..
Newsletter Signup
  Latest News  
  US firm says Indo Nippon’s ‘Whip Topping’ infringes copyright  
 

4th March 2010

 

The Delhi high court has dismissed the suit filed by US firm, Rich Products Corporation, seeking a permanent injunction against Indo Nippon Food Ltd for using the word ‘Whip Topping’ as trademark for its products. The US firm, which uses the mark, Rich’s Whip Topping, claims that it invented the vegetable based whipped cream from soya bean in the 1940s’ and is selling it in many part of the world, including India. It argued that Indo Nippon adopted the word Whip Topping for its food products, which is not only infringement of its patent but also ‘passing off’, by confusing the mind of the consumers. The high court rejected these contentions and stated that while it could not be denied that the US firm had a proprietary right in the trade mark Rich’s Whip Topping, its right did not extent to a part of the trade mark, that is, Whip Topping. “Rights in the entire or whole does not necessarily translate into a right in a “part” of the trade mark – as in this case,” the high court said.

 
Home | The Firm | Articles | Events | Careers | Contact Us                              Website Designed by Dreamz Net Solutions Website Designing Company India